Arete and Eudaimonia
The two foundational concepts of Greek civilization: arete (virtue, excellence, or the specific characteristic that makes you distinctively capable, your best self) and eudaimonia (flourishing, happiness, or the fulfillment that comes exclusively from achieving your arete), which together constitute Homer's argument that human happiness is not comfort or pleasure but the full actualization of individual excellence, a claim that Aristotle systematized in the Nicomachean Ethics and that became the philosophical core of the Western humanist tradition.
Arete (ἀρετή) in its most literal Greek sense means something like 'virtue' or 'excellence,' but its full meaning is closer to 'that which makes X distinctively excellent at being X', the specific quality that makes a sword an excellent sword, a horse an excellent horse, a human being an excellent human being. For Homer, there are two paradigmatic human aretes: the warrior's physical courage and effectiveness in battle (Achilles is the paragon) and the orator's intelligence, persuasion, and strategic communication (Odysseus is the paragon). Both are forms of genuine excellence, not competing versions of the same thing.
Eudaimonia (εὐδαιμονία) is often translated as 'happiness' but this translation flattens a precise concept. Eudaimonia is not the feeling of pleasure or comfort, it is the activity of flourishing, the condition of being fully alive as the kind of being you are. Aristotle's formalization in the Nicomachean Ethics (c. 335 BCE) made the connection precise: eudaimonia is the activity of living in accordance with your highest capacities, not a state you achieve but a way of being you continuously enact. Crucially, for both Homer and Aristotle, you cannot achieve eudaimonia by any other means than actualizing your specific arete: Achilles is eudaimon only when fighting; a human being is eudaimon only when exercising their distinctive human capacities (reason, virtue, creative excellence).
The political and civilizational implication: a society organized around arete and eudaimonia, where social recognition, status, and institutional support align with the actualization of genuine human excellence, will produce extraordinary creative and intellectual output, because the incentive system points toward genuine contribution. Greek civilization produced Plato, Sophocles, Phidias, Thucydides, and Euclid because its value system rewarded genuine excellence in philosophy, drama, sculpture, history, and mathematics. The contrast with the Virgilian system (pietas, obedience, conformity, and collective submission) explains the contrast between Greek creativity and Roman stagnation, and between the Renaissance (which recovered arete) and the Dark Ages (which enforced pietas).
Related articles
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
What is arete in ancient Greek thought? ＋
The specific excellence that makes something distinctively capable of being what it is, your best self, the quality that makes you uniquely excellent. Homer's two paradigmatic human aretes: physical courage in battle (Achilles) and intelligence in speech and strategy (Odysseus). Aristotle formalized arete as the actualization of human capacities, the activity of living fully as a human being, not merely surviving or being comfortable.
What is eudaimonia? ＋
Often translated as 'happiness,' eudaimonia actually means flourishing, the condition of being fully alive as the kind of being you are, achieved only through actualizing your specific arete. It's not a feeling but an activity: Achilles is eudaimon only when fighting; a philosopher is eudaimon only when philosophizing. You cannot achieve eudaimonia by comfort, wealth, or pleasure, only by the full actualization of your distinctive excellence. Aristotle systematized this in the Nicomachean Ethics (c. 335 BCE).