Moral Hazard
Moral hazard is the increase in risk-taking that occurs when someone is insulated from the consequences of their decisions, typically because a third party absorbs the costs of failure. The classic modern example: banks that know governments will bail them out in a financial crisis take more risk than they otherwise would. When Larry Summers applied this principle to argue against helping American homeowners in 2009 while simultaneously bailing out the banks, he illustrated the term's political weaponization.
The term originated in insurance, a person with fire insurance is slightly less careful about fire hazards than an uninsured person, because the insurer bears some of the downside. In financial economics it became central to understanding why regulated financial institutions systematically take more risk than is socially optimal: if profits go to shareholders but catastrophic losses are socialized (as in 2008), the incentive structure rewards risk-taking at others' expense.
The 2008 financial crisis is the defining contemporary case. US banks, knowing they were 'too big to fail', that their collapse would be so damaging to the broader economy that the government would have to rescue them, took on enormous leverage and risk in mortgage-backed securities and derivatives. When the system collapsed, the Obama administration's Treasury team (led by Harvard graduate Lawrence Summers and Dartmouth graduate Timothy Geithner) provided roughly $700 billion in direct bailouts plus trillions in Fed support, while allowing millions of homeowners to lose their homes.
The political hypocrisy exposed by the moral hazard argument is central to Predictive History's analysis of the professional-managerial elite. Summers argued that bailing out homeowners would create moral hazard, they would take irresponsible mortgages knowing they'd be rescued. He applied no such argument to bailing out the banks whose executives had personally profited from the same irresponsible lending. The meritocracy produced exactly what Predictive History predicts: Harvard-trained technocrats who speak the language of economic rationality to protect the institutions and classes that produced them.
Related articles
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
What is moral hazard in economics? ＋
Moral hazard is the increased risk-taking that results when someone is shielded from the consequences of their choices. In finance: banks that know governments will bail them out in a crisis take more risk than they otherwise would, because profits go to shareholders while losses are socialized. The term comes from insurance, insured people are slightly less careful because someone else pays for bad outcomes.
How was moral hazard applied hypocritically in the 2008 crisis? ＋
Treasury Secretary Larry Summers (Harvard graduate) argued that rescuing homeowners who took irresponsible mortgages would create moral hazard, teaching people there are no consequences for bad decisions. He simultaneously approved trillions in bank bailouts for institutions whose executives had personally profited from the same irresponsible lending. The moral hazard argument was applied to ordinary Americans but not to the financial elite. This selective application of economic reasoning is what Predictive History identifies as the professional-managerial elite protecting its own class.